Well known TV journalist Mr. Kamran Khan, in a series of his well intended TV programmes, is presenting to us those Pakistanis who are relentlessly working to put Pakistan on the track of success. His overwhelming emphasis is on the constructs that, Pakistan’s state enterprises and entities are full of inefficiencies, injustices. They lack respect for merit, and they do not put right people on right job, and so on and so forth. Mr. Kamran Khan’s focus is only the public sector organizations, and the organizations and institutions under control of the government. I think, private sector organizations and the organizations managed by the so-called professionals are also no better, because at the end of the day these organizations are also run by Pakistanis, as much as the public/government organizations and offices are manned by the Pakistanis.
I would request Mr. Kamran Khan to go deep into these so-called private.sector entities, and study their way of working, their love for merit and their way of doing justice to jobs, more particularly the job holders. My additional request to Mr. Khan is not to be overly influenced by the overly flowery English vocabulary of the foreign qualified professional heads of these organizations, by the colorful glossy publicity materials published through country’s top most publishing houses, and lastly but most importantly by the balance sheet footing and profit and loss figures, which these predator professionals know well how to manipulate and make attractive.
Here I want to share with Mr. Khan my experience of working.with older style of management, i.e. the bureaucrats, and with these so called professional management. I have found that, the bureaucrats never create precedence, nor do they violate any precedence. So, the progress may be slow, but there is no confusion. But these professionals never respect any precedence and never follow any precedence. The result is, chaos all around. Some hapless people working under these management, call this “management by chaos.”. We have so far seen collapse of many organizations and institutions. So, some people should come forward to study the “Pakistani type of Management”, if any one wants to see Pakistan really prosper.
-Syed Sayef Hussain
Related posts:
Posted in 
Tags: 
25 seats were reserved for MS in clinical psychology in GC university Lahore. I got 21the position. But I was deprived from admission because I am from Khyber-pakhtoonkhwa. Every one can visit notice board of GC , clinical department. They will find my name Muhammad Usman Khan on 21 th position. But I was not allowed to get admission in MS.
Dated; 17th’ November 2010
Honorable Mr. Kamran Khan,
GEO NEWS Channel-Pakistan
Subject: UNLAWFUL TERMINATION
Assslam o Alikum,
The undersigned since 1992 being as a FO and Admin & Personnel Officer served National Trust for Population Welfare (NATPOW) allied organization of Ministry of Population Welfare (MOPW) for 18 year’s.
However on 6th’ Feb. 2009, was transferred to MOPW with the mentioned only reason “in public interest” followed by OSD on 31st’ March 2009 attached with DG (M&S) MOPW.
Since 6th’ Feb. 2009 till dated 19th’ May 2010 was constantly tortured besides avoid adjustment on any vacant position.
NATPOW-BOD HR &P has taken one sides action against the undersigned to terminate of NATPOW 18 year’s unblemished service to imposed a very harsh Clause No. 13 (1) Chapter No. 3 Scheme of Administration following misguided by CEO NATPOW and former DG (PPP) MOPW due to following described reason.
NATPOW-BOD by passed Employees Service Rules Clause No. 7. 04 Chapter No.7 which is a pre requisite to establish impartial inquiry consists of honest, & neutral officers to conduct independent inquiry to deliver charge sheet & summary of allegations including recording the statement of undersigned and based upon their recommendation finding further Chairperson or Secretary of MOPW will take action against the guilty person without caring of his status of political affiliation.
1) REASONS DUE TO ISSUE ROSE- JAN-2009
File of illegal fuel expenditure of vehicle in usage of Minister for the month of Jan. 2009 including seeks advance approval of future fuel expenses of the same vehicle but the approval was refused by CEO while created hates red against the undersigned.
Minister PS demand of cash advance from NATPOW accounts was refused being as an A&PO accountable before Secretary of MOPW and AGPR audit as per chapter no. 8 clause no. 59 NATPOW rules of 1997.
NATPOW official vehicle theft case, CEO wishes due to the present Minister to soon free from all cases against Ch. Farooq like Fuel scandal & his fake degree etc.
File of fake degree already put up to place before CEO to require his action as per rules because as per inquiry conducted by the order for former Secretary MOPW Ch. Farooq was found guilty of fake degree.
In fuel scandal case CEO was briefed that in this regard the former CEO approved inquiry was still pending while as per rules needs further inquiry and action.
It was Finance & Account Officer of NATPOW who has moved CEO file through A&PO for onward submission to former Secretary-MOPW for inclusion in agenda items, before previous BOD meeting.
CEO wishes to reopen the files of demoted officials were also refused by the undersigned for further process against the rules of NATPOW.
2. UNLAWFUL IMPOSED CHAPETR NO.3 CLAUSE NO. 13 (1)
As per termination letter, that the undersigned was terminated of NATPOW-contractual service, but as per rules the undersigned has fall in category of NATPOW regular employee to by passed Chapter No. 3 Employee’s Service Rules 1997 Clause # 3.02.
In past CEO had not made courage due to fear to process this issue before NATPOW previous Board of Director’s (BOD) knows the reality.
Former DG (PPP) of MOPW only represented Secretary MOPW in BOD meeting held on 14th’ May 2010 avoided prior approval of Secretary.
NATPOW avoided as per Clause No. 7. 04. Chapter NO. 7 to establish GDCBC inquiry Committee to conduct impartial inquiry through honest & neutral officer’s without caring of any one status and political affiliation.
Since communication last year 2009 BOD well aware regarding undersigned problems due to CEO illegal orders but BOD till dated 19th’ May 2010 did not fulfill its basic responsibility to provide the opportunity to the undersigned to vindicate position.
Ch. Farooq had demote to lower step as a FO P-4 from P-3, although as per rules need’s to send him back to home or to original position as a office assistant G-4 which was unlawfully occupied by him after deceived former CEO through his fake Degree of Executive-MBA has not alternate of Master Degree.
GDCBC inquiry Committee to avoid registered police case against him but instead of case registration as per his appeal before former CEO accepted to reduce further recovery from 6, 00,000/- to 3, 00,000/- including further installments of recovery were increased from two year’s to five year’s.
For another relief CEO in official vehicle theft case had solicit the advice of MOPW for the purpose to proceed in the matter to sent MOPW a letter of DE NOVO inquiry request and as per last text that Mr. Farooq has submitted a photocopy of the withdrawal of the case from the court of civil judge vide letter No.265/Pesh/09 dated 09th’ Feb. 2009.
But as compare cited above the undersigned did not adjust on any vacant position since more a year, frequent tortured at last knocked the door of Civil Judge was terminated on 19th’ May 2010, following on same day received the summon by CEO.
Despite to extended respect to CEO transfer order on 6th’ Feb. 2009 was left NATPOW without any objection to report next day at MOPW.
First day at MOPW On 7th’ Feb. 200 was received the first explanation.
It was unofficially confirmed that on 13th’ May 2010 HR&P committee meeting was decided only to hire a legal adviser for this issue.
3) HR&P BY PASSED CHAPETR NO. 7, CLAUSE No. 7.04
HR&P has avoided delivering show-cause notice, charge sheet and summary of allegations to undersigned as per cited above rules.
Before taken action BOD and former DG (PPP) as per rules need to first formally notify besides to get prior approval of Secretary MOPW.
HR & P as per Clause No. 7.04 Chapter No. 7 Employees Service Rules of 1997 was avoided to recording the statement of undersigned and NATPOW staff, was the real eyewitnesses to know the facts.
“HR & P was also avoided to check the undersigned “ACR report” was submitted by Dr. Shafique u Rehman former Director F&A and P&D”.
CEO last year-2009 established GDCBC had consisted on Mr. Faisal PO & Mr. Sohail F&AO as inquiry officers, but unfortunately GDCBC committee has not initiated inquiry due to CEO illegal pressure as to write as per his wishes against the undersigned.
BOD-HR&P without investigation has imposed Chapter No. 3 clause No. 13 (1) of Scheme of Administration to by pass Chapter No. V Clause No. 27
But it was unofficially confirmed that on 13th’ May 2010 BOD-HR&P committee meeting, only decided to hire a legal adviser for this issue.
As per termination order that undersigned was terminated of contractual service but as per rules the undersigned was fall in the category of NATPOW regular employees to by passed Chapter No. 3 NATPOW Employee’s Service Rules 1997 Clause # 3.02.
Chapter NO. V Clause No. 36 & Chapter No. V Clause No. 37 also CLAUSE NO. 23 OF CHAPTER NO. 5 WAS ALSO BY PASSED.
List of participants of 46th meeting was found six below the valid size required for any business matter of approval.
Secondly out of six participants the status of two participants was found controversial, former DG (PPP) and CEO NATPOW.
4. DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF CEO ILLEGAL ORDERS
In Malik Nadeem Hassan consultant fee disbursement issue the undersigned was served explanation vide NO. F.NO. 5-1/2007/NGOs/NATPOW dated 29th’ Oct. 2008.
In past persuaded illegal order of CEO regarding director’s repatriation in return of communication Secretary of MOPW through former DD (FT& NGOs) the undersigned was served explanation vide F. No. 8-21/2008-NGOs-Misc dated 19th’ Jan. 2009.
About CEO status which was still in process for the purposes of endorsement by BOD with PM Secretariat through MOPW. In past CEO added the whole 12 steps of increments against the rules to pressure the undersigned to get approval from acting Chairperson previous BOD. The undersigned was strictly warned by former Secretary of MOPW that being as an A&PO as responsible of future dire consequences.
Proved that CEO has already been returned back to deposit the fuel expenditure for the month of Jan.2009 in NATPOW accounts due to fear of “facts finding inquiry”. But since Feb. 2009 monthly fuel expenditure was still paying by NATPOW.
It was also proved the cases of illegally promoted officials of NATPOW, were demoted now also endorsed by BOD as per rules.
Was found proved and fake the “bogus E-MBA degree” of Ch. Farooq through former Secretary of MOPW established inquiry Committee.
Fuel scandal case was also proved against Ch. Farooq and recovery of fuel expenditure against off road vehicle has already been initiated through installments of his monthly salary, but despite of former CEO approval order for fuel inquiry was still pending.
Now it was also proved that Ch. Farooq recently again given financial loss of Rs. one million to NATPOW.
5. SUBMISSION OF APPEAL’S
Chairperson and CEO letter no. F-1 (31) 94-Ad (P) dated 03rd’ August 2010 dated 6th’ August 2010 while in return reply against the appeal instead of provides relief to undersigned was warn from exercises freedom of expression. The last post appeal hearing report dated 3rd’ Oct. 2010 is as attached herewith for further reviewing.
“ CEO mentioned in the reply letter that the undersigned decision of termination was taken by NATPOW BOD Committee on HR&P on 13th’ May 2010 and duly endorsed by the Board of Directors in its 46th Meeting held on 14th May 2010”
Just a day before BOD meeting HR &P has taken one side action without implementation of Employees Service Rules Chapter No. 7 Clause. 7.04.
The CEO in reply letter strictly directed the undersigned to avoid in future further harassment and writing letters again and again, that causing delay/hindrance in the routine business of NATPOW, while further warned if this practice is not stopped hence forth, and NATPOW may have to take a stern action against such activities of undersigned”.
CEO NATPOW by passed Clause No. 7.04 Chapter No. 7 to imposed directly harsh Clause No. 13 (1) thorough the shoulder of BOD- HR&P Committee.
Since 6th Feb. 2009 transferred to MOPW, was submitted several re presentations mainly focused on two requests i.e. adjustment on any vacant position and secondly demand of impartial inquiry as per rules, but it was still not implemented due to CEO due to fear of exposés.
“CEO mentioned in reply letter that the post of Admin & Personnel officer was not advertised besides the promotion of the undersigned was also lacked the BOD endorsement”.
Advertisement was not pre requisite condition for internal promotion to next step and it was applicable on those staff who fall in employee’s of support staff have need to cross many steps need’s advertisement as per rules of NATPOW 1997.
The undersigned entered through proper way as per rules but it was honorable CEO who entered after by passed selection criteria of suitable CEO and advertisement.
On 9th’ Jan. 2009 CEO after thoroughly checked the all relevant record of Ch. Farooq was on same day later on communicated through vide letter no. F-No.ce/master/09 dated 09th’ Jan. 2009 address to Ch. Farooq with the following remarks;
Text Para -2; “An inquiry was conducted on 16th’ Sept. 2008. As a result, you were found guilty. You have misguided/deceived the Competent Authority stating to hold an inquiry again”.
Text Para-3; “You are advised to explain your position within three days as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you according to NATPOW Employees Service Rules, 1997.
But later on CEO side had sent a letter to MOPW vide No. F-1(68) 98-Ad (P) dated 11th, March 2009 of recommendation De Novo inquiry against Ch. Farooq to Competent Authority of MOPW for providing another relief to him.
It was proved now that Ch. Farooq has again misappropriated NATPOW one million funds of NGOs but he was still NATPOW employee though now he has behind the bars. CEO earlier remarked that the undersigned has personal grudges with him.
To refrain the former director F&A Mrs. Najma Naheed from unlawful utilization of NATPOW assets i.e. telephone and official vehicles etc.
Are it was personal grudges with demoted officers who have got illegal promotion in past to avoid future audit objection & complication.
Refused the unlawful fuel demand of former DG besides present Minister of miss uses of official vehicles including her Ps demand of cash advance from NATPOW accounts.
It is also personal grudges with both directors-Dr. Shafique u Rehman & Ms Najma Naheed had sent letter to MOPW for their repatriation.
In addition of above as per appeal’s against NATPOW unlawful decision before the honorable Chairperson NATPOW BOD, Senator Mrs. Suria Amir u Din and CEO NATPOW Mr. Iftekhar Durrani in return response strictly instructed the undersigned to sit in inside home to silently bear the pain of termination to covered mouth with tape after severe tortured of victimization of mentally, socially, economically and professional that on 19th’ May 2010 terminated of NATPOW 18 years unblemished service.
However in this regard wants to clear before Chairperson, Senator Mrs. Suria Amir u Din and CEO NATPOW Mr. Iftekhar Durrani that the undersigned never accept at any cost to limit himself to home because the person who victimized in return of his principal stand to performed duty as per NATPOW rules while none follow cited above then same count partner like the person who committed the sin before Almighty Allah. However the undersigned came out of home to raise voice till the last breath against CEO and Chairperson NATPOW- BOD unlawful decision of termination against undersigned.
Apart from above in response of the undersigned 2nd’ remainder dated 2nd’ Oct, 2010 regarding appeal before the honorable Secretary of MOPW as per vide CEO NATPOW Admin Section letter No. F-(131) 94-Ad (P) dated 25th, Oct, 2010 to appear before BOD-HR&P Committee on 3rd’ November 2010 at NATPOW head office Islamabad. (Attached =2)
Therefore it was an injustice & inhuman direct act or process of coercing due to CEO that HR&P committee was compelled to impose on undersigned a very harsh clause NO. 13. (1) to by pass the NATPOW Employees Service Rules Clause No. 7.04 Chapter No. 7.
But as compare those who have committed offences even proved against them never imposed such clause No. 13 (1) Chapter No. 3 NATPOW which showed the personal grudges of CEO.
It is requested before honorable Mr. Kamaran Khan that please in view of cited above facts to provide coverage opportunity in your program “KAMRAN KHAN KAISATH” aimed to bring in to the notice of honorable Chief Justice Supreme Court of Pakistan for “SOU MOTO Action” to establish impartial inquiry committee to carry out independent inquiry through honest & neutral officers without any one status and political affiliation with the ruling party of high claim to providing “Ruti Kaprah Makhan” to poor masses of the country. However instead of providing they catch from poor masses like the undersigned to impose a very harsh clause NO. 13 (1) Chapter No. 3 without any impartial inquiry to proved guilty of misconduct was found great injustice and human rights violation. Since a couple of days back the Prime Minister of Pakistan told to the house that there is no any government employee was sacked.
With regard!
(LIAQAT ALI KHAN)
Admin &Personnel Officer NATPOW
(Under unlawful termination)
Cell No. 0300-5151073
• In case of any further endorsement to verify through my Cell # 0300-5151073 any time.
• If in case any one from Minister of Population Welfare (MPOW) or NATPOW contact in this regard then I will 24 hours ready to appear any time any where for return answer of any query in this regard.
• Supported documents are available.
Postal Address: H # 39 Block # P, Street @ 1 Railway Scheme Chaklala Rawalpindi
Dated: 7th’ November 2010
Subject: POST REPORT -CALL FOR PERSONAL HEARING
Kindly refer to NATPOW letter No. F-1(31) 94-Ad (P) dated 25th’ Oct, 2010, regarding of “CALL FOR PERSONAL HEARING” while in this regard the undersigned on 03rd’ Nov. 2010 at 11.00 AM has attended the personal hearing of HR&P Committee.
1. It was totally a joke with the undersigned because during the proceeding of hearing on 3rd’ Oct, 2010 to restrict the undersigned by Dr. Parveen Ashraf a member of HR&P Committee despite well prepared with documentary evidential proofs appeared before the HR&P wish to give proper presentation. However it was not possible due to her partial attitude because Dr. Parveen Ashraf constantly interrupted to rise & focused on one point that everything was cleared but why the undersigned in last year-2009 has wrote letters to new BOD a few days before expected date of holding first meeting.
2. In return of her statement undersigned briefed the HR&P Committee that despite passing of twelve months the new BOD has not yet take any note of the undersigned mentioned problems faced due to CEO illegal orders till to date except on 19th’ May 2010 has taken one sides action to impose on the undersigned a very harsh clause No. 13 (1) chapter No. 3 following terminated of NATPOW 18 years unblemished service without proved guilty of misconduct through any GDCBC Committee impartial inquiry conducted through neutral & honest officers. Though the undersigned whatever has done for the better interest of the organization along with own self defense as a side safety because later on would accountable before new BOD that being as an Administration Officer avoid timely sharing of information. Dr. Parveen Asharaf member HR&P has focused on last year-2009 communication with new installed BOD that as per her views which was make the cause of undersigned termination. The undersigned astonished that instead of addresses the problems that created due to illegal orders of CEO including adjustment at NATPOW or MOPW on any vacant position now on 19th’ May 2010 the BOD HR&P have done a wonderful job to terminate the undersigned of NATPOW 18 year’s unblemished service. Her partial & unbiased attitude apparently seemed motivated one which was same observed on 3rd’ Oct, 2010 during the hearing.
3. Second main reason behind her anger was that since ten years back as per country vide program of NGOs affiliation, her NGO was found inactive during the undersigned visit while the documentary evidences earlier submitted by her to NATPOW was also found unmatched. Due to such reason the undersigned did not recommend her NGO for affiliation hence due to such reason she spoke against the undersigned.
4. HR&P on the basis of CEO recommendation has taken one side’s action to imposed Clause No. 13 (1) Chapter No. 3 without implementation of Employees Service Rules 1997 Clause No. 7.04 Chapter No.7 which was pre requisite for the process was ignored. Due to CEO rival status who developed personal grudges with the undersigned.
ii) Was fall in NATPOW regular service while in this regard HR & P has by passed Chapter No. 3 ESR 1997 Clause # 3.02, there shall be the following categories of employees: (a) Regular Employees (b) Temporary Employees
iii) it was unofficially confirmed that on 13th’ May 2010 BOD-HR&P committee meeting was only decided to hire a legal adviser for said issue.
5. In past holding position of A&PO hardly just for 4-5 months has faced several risky challenges from NATPOW mafia staff. While in this regard has already been taken timely action for the mitigation of these challenges which was in progress that on 20th’ Dec. 2008 the present CEO entered NATPOW through back door has badly affected the organization interest.
6. Being as responsible position holder of A&PO conveyed problems faced because the previous BOD was terminated which was well aware.
7. Writing letters to new BOD that must be aware such kind of illegal orders of the present CEO has timely conveyed not alone the undersigned problems but most important one factor of organization better interest which was my basic duty as per job description being as an Administration Officer.
8. As per comments of HR&P member Mr. Yaseen Gohar Deputy Financial Advisor of Ministry of Finance that it was not a matter of serious concern to be resolve soon because whatever happened due to misunderstanding.
9. HR&P in general and Dr. Parveen Ashraf in particular was told, that the undersigned has involved in following any; (i) sexual abuse (ii) stolen of NATPOW official vehicle or other assets (iii) fraud case & corruption cases of NATPOW (iv) got illegal promotion against the rules (v) and misbehaved of mafia with former Chairperson and the Minister of PW.
10. Accountable before Honorable Secretary of MOPW & AGPR
a) Being as an A&PO besides CEO & BOD also accountable before Secretary MOPW & AGPR Audit team and in past we have experienced to get wisdom after frequent failure due to several complications which was reported in NATPOW accounts was hidden through private audit company. That’s why CEO was requested to go for AGR special audit as per Chapter No. 8 Clause No. 59 NATPOW rules of 1997.
b) Dr. Parveen Ashraf said that we have successfully carried out audit under her pattern ship through charted accounts company has recently approved by PAC of National Assembly. HR&P was told that to carry out audit through private company has nothing except to loss of money to eaten away chicken and illegal utilization of official vehicle later on auditors would prepare the audit report as per wishes of management.
11. Honorable Chairperson NATPOW-BOD
i) ACR report has submitted by immediate boss Dr. Shafiq u Rehman former Director F&A and P&D has also by passed by HR&P Committee. But as per Chairperson that ACR report has already been checked by her, which was found average.
ii) In view of cited above it is my humble request before Chairperson that the ACR report of the undersigned has submitted by Dr. Shahfiq u Rehman may please be share as soon as possible and if the claim was found true in return the undersigned will forever refrain not only from demand of reinstatement but also prefer to go jail. Prior Dr. Shaifq u Rehman appraisal report no any such concept was existed at NATPOW except provision of appreciation certificate was available more then two dozen.
ii) Honorable chairperson know the reality and undersigned was advised that being is a Chairperson not in a position due to some reason to reinstate the undersigned but made approach to Prime Minister or President to enable her to put pressure on CEO that now it was our compulsion to reinstate the undersigned. But on 3rd’ Oct, 2010 the situation was found quite different that honorable Chairperson was found totally changed from her earlier stand of providing relief because as per her point of view that the undersigned was fault less in this issue but now she remarked against the undersigned that why last year-2009 the undersign side had written letters to BOD, human rights and newspaper.
iii) Honorable chairperson was told that all of this was happened in last year 2009, because the reply of two explanations & one charge sheet served the undersigned timely submitted in last year 2009, hence this chapter was already closed down. In this regard HR&P Committee decision of termination after imposed a very harsh clause No. 13 (1) chapter NO. 3 NATPOW Scheme of Administration was found totally against the rules of NATPOW that without caring of NATPOW rules and without establish GDCBC for conducting impartial inquiry through honest & neutral officers was still ignored by NATPOW-BOD due to fear of exposes before the Competent Authority of BOD & MOPW.
Submitted for further reviewing please!
(LIAQAT ALI KHAN)
Administration & Personnel Officer NATPOW
(Under Unlawful Termination)
Cell # 0300-5151073
Dated 3rd’ Nov. 2010
Subject; CALL FOR PERSONAL HEARING
Kindly refer to NATPOW letter No. F-(131) 94-Ad (P) dated 25th, Oct, 2010 regarding cited above subject while in this regard the undersigned has visited on 3rd’ November 2010 at 11.00 AM to attend hearing at NATPOW head office Islamabad.
2. I am very thankful of all honorable BOD-HR&P Committee members including honorable Chairperson and Secretary Ministry of Population welfare, MOPW was represented by honorable Joint Secretary MOPW that provided opportunity to the undersigned to vindicate position before HR & P Committee. Meanwhile after a short briefing agreed all the honorable members including honorable Chairperson NATPOW-BOD except honorable Dr. Praveen Ashraf while as per her point of view that everything was cleared but the undersigned in last year-2009 writing letters to honorable Board of directors has left nothing for the undersigned way out.
3. Sending & writing a letters in last year 2009 actually extended respect and value to convey the problems to new installed BOD for the purpose of addresses. In this regard to clarify position with sorry before HR&P Committee that the undersigned have no any bad intention to malign the organization except the problems faced due to present CEO NATPOW due to his illegal orders. But since in last year-2009, the HR&P Committee until now did not called to hear point of view of the undersigned.
Keeping in view of cited above fact kindly it is requested in the honor of Secretary Ministry of Population Welfare (MOPW), honorable Chairperson NATPOW and all BOD-HR&P Committee members including honorable Dr. Parveen Ashraf to please lift over such a very harsh clause of NATPOW rules imposed on undersigned without implementation of NATPOW rules to return back the undersigned to original position as soon as possible.
With regard!
(Liaqat Ali Khan)
Honorable Secretary Ministry of Population Welfare (MOPW)
Government of Pakistan Islamabad
Honorable Joint Secretary Ministry of Population Welfare (MOPW)
Government of Pakistan
Honorable Chairperson NATPOW
& Senator Mrs. Suria Amir u Din Upper House Islamabad
Upper House Islamabad
Vice Chairperson NATPOW and BOD HR&P Committee’s Members